WIKI HEALTHNUT NEWS MANUAL

As Joshua Frank writes:įor the record, neither Jeffrey or I have ever appeared on RT or Sputnik, we've both turned down dozens of requests, in part because we are opposed to state-run media. After a brief exchange of emails, they agreed to remove them from the list.

CounterPunch was included in one of the earlier versions of the list.

They might not be propaganda, but most of them are definitely fake news sites. The list of the 202 websites that purportedly spread Russian propaganda

WIKI HEALTHNUT NEWS MANUAL

On November 30 2016, PropOrNot published a list of 202 websites that they classify as Russian propaganda based on 'a combination of manual and automated analysis, including analysis of content, timing, technical indicators, and other reporting', which the anonymous group suggests are 'consistently, uncritically, and one-sidedly echoing, repeating, being used by, and redirecting their audiences to Russian official and semi-official state media'. If it passes in all of the above, it is claimed to be safe to classify the site as Russian propaganda.

Check 7: Steadfastly avoids coherently proposing constructive solutions to anything.Check 6: Called out by other credible fact-checkers, journalists, and debunkers.Check 5: Lacks the hallmarks of good actual journalism (well-cited, balanced, bias-free).Check 4: History of echoing the Russian line in strange ways.

Check 3: History of generally echoing the Russian propaganda 'line'.Check 2: History of reusing text from obvious Russian propaganda.

Check 1: Citing obvious Russian propaganda sites such as RT, Fort-Russ etc.

PropOrNot’s methodology consists of 7 checks.

Wiki healthnut news